• (352) 354-2749
  • Mon - Fri: 8:30 - 5:30 EST

At Myolyn, our vision is to improve health and human performance by empowering people to move. We are proud to announce a new partnership that will strengthen our vision and enhance our mission in Powering Your Potential! Meet Amanda Perla, the new Brand Ambassador for Myolyn.

After a motor vehicle accident 10 years ago, Amanda sustained a spinal cord injury, leaving her a C6 quadriplegic. After going through in-patient rehabilitation and outpatient physical therapy, Amanda found the goals to be extremely limited. It was then that she began to do research to find a more aggressive recovery program.

Her research paid off when she found the MyoCycle. MYOLYN's founders, Matt and Alan, brought a MyoCycle to NextStep Orlando, where Amanda was able to experience the MyoCycle first hand. After six months of using the MyoCycle, Amanda noticed a positive change and felt like the FES cycle was a great source of cardio and really helped to keep her body healthy.

Now, Amanda and Myolyn have come together in a partnership that will bring awareness to the benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and Myolyn’s FES products. As a speaker and representative for NextStep Orlando, she plays a vital role in their recovery program just as she will play a vital role at Myolyn as the Brand Ambassador. With this new partnership, Myolyn and Amanda hope to be able to help others to stay happy and healthy by empowering them to move.
“It was a product that I really wanted to have and I'm just excited to share it [the MyoCycle] with all of my friends that need an FES bike either at home or at their gym setting as well.” – Amanda Perla

If you’d like to learn more about how the MyoCycle can help someone with paralysis to get a great workout, click here!
MYOLYN is committed to supporting research into the benefits of FES for people with neurological disorders. Sign up for our newsletter to keep up to date with the results!

Published in MYOLYN RSS FEED

While most people, including researchers, are interested in the benefits of FES-cycling for people with spinal cord injuries, a growing body of evidence is now spurring research into the benefits for other disease categories.

In a recently completed French study (NCT02594722), researchers asked whether FES-cycling might improve aerobic capacity in a range of breathing conditions called chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

COPD is a progressive and potentially fatal disease that makes it hard to breathe. COPD includes people with emphysema and chronic bronchitis, and it affects an estimated 64 million people around the world, according to the World Health Organization.

In this first study of FES-cycling for COPD, the researchers enrolled 25 COPD patients. The study participants completed two measured sessions to see if FES-cycling improves certain metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes during endurance exercise. Participants were divided into two groups: an experimental group that participated in active FES-cycling and a placebo group that experienced sham FES (low level stimulation with no significant muscle contractions).

In each session, participants underwent 30 minutes of constant load cycling while the researchers measured oxygen uptake, ventilation equivalent for oxygen, ventilation equivalent for carbon dioxide, cardiac output, and lactate values, as well as perceived difficulty in breathing and perceived muscle fatigue.

The results of the study demonstrate significantly increased VO2 average (oxygen uptake) for the FES-cycling session compared to the non-FES session and a significant increase in lactate after the FES-cycling compared to standard session.

VO2 measures the body’s ability to consume oxygen, and higher lactic acid levels indicate more strenuous exercise. COPD patients have impaired lung function, which limits their ability to achieve sufficient exercise intensity to benefit from it. Thus, the higher average VO2 and lactate levels achieved by the COPD patients after FES-cycling indicates that the added FES increased the effective exercise intensity, potentially enabling people with COPD to achieve greater health benefits from exercise augmented by FES.

“These physiological results suggest that FES-cycling can improve cardiovascular and metabolic responses to exertion,” wrote the study authors. “To the best of our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the potential benefits of FES-cycling in patients with COPD.”

If further research corroborates this study, then the number of people around the world who might use FES-cycling to improve their health could vastly grow beyond people with spinal and neurological disorders, as there are over 3 million cases of COPD each year in the US alone.

MYOLYN’s mission is to improve health and human performance by empowering people to move. That vision drove the development of both clinical and home versions of the MyoCycle, which combines isokinetic cycling and FES into a single system to improve outcomes. While the MyoCycle was originally designed for people with paralysis, it has the potential to empower millions of other people to improve their own health by moving better. If you or someone you love is interested in the benefits of FES-cycling, please contact MYOLYN today!

Source: BMJ Open Respiratory Research, April 12, 2016


Published in MYOLYN RSS FEED

While a number of studies have demonstrated the benefits of FES-cycling therapy for people who have had a stroke, the question Italian researchers wanted to answer is whether FES-cycling might be better than standard physiotherapy for recovering functional motion.

To answer this question, the researchers recruited 16 patients who experienced their first stroke less than 6 months prior to enrolling in the study. All patients were over 18 years old and were evaluated before and after therapy training using standard measures of function including gait analysis and volitional cycling ability.

Participants were randomly assigned to FES-cycling therapy or standard physical therapy. Both groups were compared to an age-matched healthy group. Participants underwent 75 minutes of training a day for 15 days. In the FES group, the training consisted of 25 minutes of FES-assisted cycling and 50 minutes of standard therapy. The comparison group did 75 minutes of standard physiotherapy, including strength and stretching exercises, gait training, and hand rehabilitation.

At the end of the intervention, participants underwent testing and evaluation by therapists who were unaware of the group to which the patients belonged. The tests included functional evaluation, 6-minute walk test, and a cycling test, where patients were asked to volitionally pedal at four different velocities (20, 30, 40 and 50 revolutions per minute).

A comparison of the FES-cycling and standard therapy groups showed that both obtained similar improvements in functional performance as a result of the intervention (45.2% and 47.9% improvement for the FES-cycling and standard therapy groups, respectively).

Analysis of the gait speed and double support time (how long both feet are on the ground during walking) showed that the FES-cycling group experienced greater improvements in both of these measures as compared to the standard therapy group. Specifically, the FES-cycling group experienced a 35.4% increase in gait speed and a 33.8% reduction in double support time, while the standard therapy group only had a 24.3% increase in gait speed and a 23.0% reduction in double support time.

The greatest differences between the FES-cycling and standard therapy groups were highlighted by the cycling test. Patients in the FES-cycling group could produce significantly more power with their affected leg (30.5% versus 11.1% improvement in the control group) with a more symmetrical and efficient pedaling motion.

The researchers concluded that these preliminary results suggest that FES-assisted cycling training is safe and effective for improving both cycling and walking ability in post-acute elderly stroke patients. In fact, FES-assisted cycling training is at least as effective as standard physiotherapy and, in some measures, is more effective.

The study did not look at the benefits of FES-cycling therapy that have been shown in other studies, such as improved exercise capacity, aerobic capacity and cardiopulmonary function. It also was limited to 15 sessions and the authors said the preliminary results indicated that 15 sessions may not be enough to show a significant difference between the two groups.

While FES-cycling has long been associated with benefits to people with spinal cord injury, a growing body of research is showing that people with other neurological disorders such as stroke may have as much or more to gain from FES-cycling.

If you or someone you love has had a debilitating stroke and is interested in FES-cycling, contact us today to learn how an affordable MyoCycle Home can become part of your recovery and rehabilitation program and enable you to gain the benefits of standard physical therapy from the comfort of home.

 Source: European Journal of Translational Myology, Sep. 2016



Published in MYOLYN RSS FEED

Among people with spinal cord injury, who is most likely to benefit from functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy? That’s a great question that many researchers are asking in regard to a wide range of spinal cord injuries.

In a small study of 14 paraplegics wishing to participate in sports, researchers found that people whose spinal cord injury occurred above T-12 were more likely to benefit from FES-cycling therapy, and those with traumatic injury as opposed to infectious injury were the most likely to respond to FES-cycling therapy.

The Brazilian and French researchers published their findings in the European Journal of Translational Myology last fall.

In the study, the researchers aimed to examine the personal, clinical, structural, and functional characteristics of people with paraplegia interested in sports. They assessed all for responsiveness to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) by applying stimulation to the subjects’ leg muscles. They divided those whose muscles visibly contracted into the responsive group and those whose did not assigned to the non-responsive group.

In all, there were 14 volunteers, 3 men and 11 women between the ages of 23 and 56, who had been living with paralysis from 2 to 50 months. All participated in 16-sessions using surface NMES applied to the quadriceps and progressing to other muscle groups. The strength of contractions in response to NMES was measured on a scale from 0 to 5, where 3/5 was considered strong enough for movement against gravity.

The researchers found that all the volunteers who responded to NMES had spinal cord injuries above T-12, while among those who did not respond, half had injuries above T-12 and half had injuries below T-12 or the lumbar area. When they distinguished between spinal injury caused by trauma versus infection, they found that only one in the non-responsive group had spinal cord injury above T-12.

They concluded that paraplegics with traumatic spinal injuries above T-12 were the best potential candidates for FES-cycling therapy. According to the 2015 Annual Report by the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCISC), 90% of people with spinal cord injury are injured at T-12 or above, meaning that 9 out of 10 people with spinal cord injury are likely good candidates for FES-cycling therapy.

The explanation for these results is that injury below T-12, or certain types of spinal cord infections, typically damage the peripheral nerves. Without intact peripheral nerves, NMES/FES cannot cause the muscles to contract, meaning that people with damaged peripheral nerves are not good candidates for FES-cycling therapy.

If you or a loved one may be a candidate for FES-cycling therapy, the MyoCycle Home may be right for you. It is the most affordable, easiest-to-use FES bike ever made, and it empowers people with muscle weakness or paralysis to get the best workout possible from the comfort of home.

Source: European Journal of Translational Myology, Sep 2016


Published in MYOLYN RSS FEED

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a broadly-defined neurological disorder that encompasses brain injury or malformation in a child’s brain that occurs before, during, or immediately after birth and results in impaired motor control [1]. Because of the broad definition of CP, people with CP can exhibit a very wide range of symptoms, and no two people with CP will exhibit the same symptoms. However, people with CP generally have difficulty moving parts of their bodies normally because of muscle weakness or paralysis, impaired muscle coordination, and/or spasticity. Impaired motor control can also be accompanied by intellectual impairment, seizures, or sensory impairment.

Physical impairment can severely limit participation in physical activity by people with CP, as is true for anyone with physical impairments. Lack of physical activity can lead to the development of any number of chronic diseases [2], especially in children with disabilities like CP [3]. Exercise is an effective method for mitigating the negative secondary health effects of neuromuscular diseases like CP [4], but how can someone with CP exercise despite their impaired motor control, especially when 31% of children with Cerebral Palsy have limited or no walking ability [5]?
Stationary cycling is an especially effective means of exercising for people with disabilities, as it’s a relatively simple task that physically engages the entire lower body but doesn’t require dynamic balancing. Unfortunately, physical impairment often prevents children with CP from cycling at workloads high enough to achieve a significant therapeutic effect. Cycling combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES-cycling) has been used for more than 30 years to help people with spinal cord injury exercise despite physical impairment [6]. Recent research is proving that an FES bike, especially FES-assisted cycling, where the patient actively participates in the cycling with help from FES, offers similar benefits for people with CP [7]-[10]. Specifically, the research has demonstrated the following benefits:
•    Improved muscle coordination and strength
•    Immediate improvements in cycling performance
•    Improved walking ability
•    Better quality of life

FES-cycling may also provide afferent sensory input to the central nervous system that enhances brain plasticity and cortical motor output, which may further improve functional outcomes in a manner similar to the effect of FES-cycling for people with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, or stroke.
FES-cycling can significantly improve quality of life for people with CP, as it provides them a way to achieve therapeutically significant levels of physical activity despite their physical impairments. The MyoCycle is an affordable, easy-to-use FES bike that can be used by people with Cerebral Palsy to achieve the combined benefits of cycling, isokinetic exercise, and FES. The MyoCycle can specifically provide the following benefits to people with CP:
•    Relaxation of muscle spasms
•    Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy
•    Increasing local blood circulation
•    Muscle re-education
•    Maintaining or increasing range of motion

If you or someone you love has CP and is interested in FES-cycling, contact us today to learn how the MyoCycle can meet your needs or join the waiting list now!

[1] CerebralPalsy.org

[2] Booth, F. W.; Roberts, C. K.; Laye, M. J. 2012. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr Physiol. 2(2):1143-1211.

[3] United States Government. Healthy People 2010: Disability and Secondary Conditions. 2005.

[4] Anziska, Y. and Sternberg, A. 2013. Exercise in neuromuscular disease. Muscle Nerve. 48(1):3-20.

[5] CDC.gov

[6] Petrofsky, J. S.; Phillips, C. A.; Heaton, H. H.; Glaser, R. M. 1984. Bicycle ergometer for paralyzed muscle. Journal of Clinical Engineering. 9(1):13-19.

[7] Harrington, A. T.; McRae, C. G. A.; Lee, S. C. K. 2012. Evaluation of functional electrical stimulation to assist cycling in four adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy. International Journal of Pediatrics.

[8] McRae, C. G. A.; Johnston, T. E.; Lauer, R. T.; Tokay, A. M.; Lee, S. C. K.; Hunt, K. J. 2009. Cycling for children with neuromuscular impairments using electrical stimulation—development of tricycle-based systems. Med Eng Phys. 31(6):650-9.

[9] Johnston, T. E. and Wainwright, S. F. 2011. Cycling with functional electrical stimulation in an adult with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 91(6):970-82.

[10] Peng, C.-W. et al. 2011. Review. Clinical Benefits of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling Exercise for Subjects with Central Neurological Impairments. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. 31(1):1-11.

[11] CerebralPalsyGuidance.com

Published in MYOLYN RSS FEED
Page 1 of 2

Get In Touch

  • 7731 W Newberry Rd Suite A2, Gainesville, FL 32606
  • (352) 354-2749
  • myolyn@myolyn.com

Twitter Feed

We made it to #LosAngeles! Visit our booth to experience the #MyoCycle and to learn more about how we are Empowerin… https://t.co/uVdmBz0Q8b
Follow MYOLYN, LLC on Twitter